How security teams turn fragmented signals into decisions.
SentriScope supports multiple analyst workflows from the same canonical data foundation (prioritization, investigation, incident readiness, attack surface visibility, and CTI correlation) without forcing teams into disconnected tools.
- Prioritize Exposure triage Rank findings with CVSS, EPSS, KEV, SSVC, and business context.
- Investigate Guided sessions Evidence-linked investigation across assets, identities, and CTI.
- Prepare Incident readiness Lifecycle management linked to investigations and risk decisions.
- Correlate CTI & surface Map threat intelligence and exposure to one canonical model.
One data foundation. Multiple security-team workflows.
Where most teams start
Prioritization, investigation, and attack-surface or CTI correlation are the workflows evaluators map first. Each is grounded in the same canonical model and Risk Decision Objects.
Exposure triage that ranks what matters
Vulnerability and exposure managers reduce noise by prioritizing findings with CVSS, EPSS, CISA KEV, SSVC, and business impact in one correlated view, not raw severity alone. Every prioritization decision can be recorded as a Risk Decision Object with explainability and override governance.
See Risk Decision Objects- Multi-signal prioritization beyond CVSS severity
- Business context and control effectiveness in ranking
- Auditable Risk Decision Objects with override governance
Guided investigation into incident lifecycle
Analysts open investigation sessions against prioritized findings with evidence tracking, notes, and scenario work. Incident readiness covers the full lifecycle (detection through response and post-incident learning), linked to investigations and Risk Decision Objects. Escalation remains analyst-controlled; automatic incident creation is not assumed.
Explore investigation workflow- Guided investigation sessions with evidence tracking
- Incident lifecycle linked to investigations and RDOs
- Analyst-controlled escalation, not unsupervised automation
Attack surface visibility with threat intelligence correlation
ASM teams unify external and internal exposure across governed connectors into the canonical model. CTI teams enrich indicators when providers are configured, review fusion scoring, and correlate threats with assets, identities, and exposures under analyst verdict, not autonomous pipeline entry.
Browse integrations catalog- Unified external and internal exposure with provenance
- IOC enrichment and fusion scoring when configured
- Verdict-gated CTI correlation into canonical context
Specialized workflows on the same foundation
Identity, network context, attack path analysis, and DevSecOps data integration extend the same spine, with clear qualifications where automation or UI depth is bounded.
-
Identity and network contextIdentity and credential risk Identify over-privileged identities, compromised credentials, and breach-linked accounts using canonical identity risk aggregation and Entra ID profiling, correlated with CTI and exposure findings.Network and asset context Correlate network flows, segmentation policies, and OT/industrial context with asset risk to understand lateral movement paths and segmentation gaps in environment context.
-
Qualified analysis pathsAttack path analysis Analyst-driven, contextual attack path analysis helps explain how exposures chain together and which findings enable higher-impact paths. This is contextual analysis to inform prioritization, not autonomous path discovery.DevSecOps and SBOM foundations Ingest SBOM components and artifact lineage via API and data integration to extend supply-chain risk context into canonical posture. This is a data-integration foundation, not a dedicated tenant SBOM UI.
-
Trust and decision supportGuardrails for AI-assisted workflows When enabled, LLM assistance is read-only, schema-grounded, and tenant-scoped. It supports understanding. It does not autonomously remediate or create incidents without analyst control.Platform governance behind every scenario Connector governance, tenant isolation, and tamper-evident audit underpin every workflow, so scenario outcomes remain explainable and scoped.
Related platform areas
Map a scenario to product depth, intelligence workflows, architecture, integrations, or trust controls.
Product
Capability catalog: exposure, prioritization, investigation, and related modules.
Intelligence
Investigation workspace, CTI review, and verdict-gated correlation.
Platform
Architecture, connector governance, and operator foundations.
Integrations
Live connector and CTI provider catalog for your stack.
Security
Isolation, audit, RBAC, and LLM guardrails for trust evaluation.
Documentation
Certified public documentation, not internal repository exposure.
Contact
Scenario fit, evaluation scope, and deployment questions.
Map your team's workflow to the platform
Explore product capabilities and intelligence workflows, or talk to our team about how your scenarios fit the canonical model.